www.hypersmash.com

تابعنا على شبكاتنا الإجتماعية

This is default featured post 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Showing posts with label poem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poem. Show all posts

Saturday, April 27, 2013

To Althea. From prison summary and analysis

To Althea. From prison





.
The Author
.......Richard Lovelace (1618-1657) was a dashing, handsome, well-educated gentleman who, as a soldier and poet, strongly defended the king during The Bishops' Wars in Scotland (1639-1640) and the English Civil Wars (1642-1651). He held inherited estates in Kent and freely used his personal resources to support the king's causes. He became famous as one of the cavalier poets. (See Reason for Imprisonment for further information on these poets.)
Type of Work
......."To Althea, From Prison" is a lyric poem on the paradoxical theme of freedom during imprisonment. It was written in 1642 and published in 1649 in a poetry collection called:     To Lucasta.
Setting
.......Richard Lovelace (1618-1657) sets "To Althea, From Prison" within the walls of Gate House, a prison in Westminster, London. While confined there for seven weeks in 1642, he spent part of his time writing "To Althea" and another poem.
Reason for Imprisonment
.......During a power struggle in England between King Charles I and Parliament, Lovelace sided with the king. Charles—King of England, Ireland, and Scotland from 1625 to 1649—believed strongly that his authority was God-given and pre-eminent. This viewpoint disconcerted Parliament. Charles further unsettled Parliament when he married a French Catholic, Princess Henrietta Maria, and when he championed the authority of the Church of England, insisting on preservation of its elaborate rituals in opposition to the wishes of a large bloc of Puritans in Parliament. After Parliament took issue with his foreign policy and his administration of the national purse, Charles dissolved Parliament (1629) and governed without it until 1640, when he convened a new Parliament. Sentiment against him remained strong. However, he had his defenders—notably a group of writers known as Cavalier poets. They were refined, cultured, fashionably dressed gentlemen—the very definition of cavalier—who included Lovelace, as well as Thomas Carew, Robert Herrick, and Sir John Suckling. When Parliament Puritans known as Roundheads (because of their short haircuts compared with the luxurious locks of the cavaliers) ousted Anglican bishops from Parliament, Lovelace presented a petition calling for their restoration. In response, Parliament imprisoned him in Gate House. 



Characters

Speaker: He is a prisoner who declares that those who confined him cannot stop him from exercising his ability to think and dream.
Althea: The woman to whom Lovelace addresses the poem. Her identity is uncertain; she may even have been a product of Lovelace's imagination. However, evidence suggests she was a woman named Lucy Sacheverell.
The King: Charles I.
Meter and End Rhyme
.......The eight lines in each stanza of the poem alter between iambic tetrameter (with eight syllables and four iambic feet) and iambic trimeter (with six syllables and three iambic feet). An iambic foot consists of an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed syllable. The rhyme scheme is as follows: ababacdcd. The following graphic presentation illustrates the rhyme scheme and meter in the first stanza.

........1...... .  ...    ..2.......  ....3...............4
When LOVE..|..with UN..|..con FIN..|..èd WINGS........(iambic tetrameter) 
.......1........ . ..2.......  .....3
Hov ERS..|..with IN..|..my GATES..............................(iambic trimeter)
......1......   ...2......... ...3................4
And MY..|..div INE..|..Al THE..|..a BRINGS..................(iambic tetrameter) 
......1......   .  ..2...........  ....3
To WHIS..|..per AT..|..the GRATES............................(iambic trimeter)
......1......   . ..2......... ....3.............4
When I..|..lie TANG..|..led IN..|..her HAIR...................(iambic tetrameter)
.......1......    .. ..2........  ....3
And FET..|..tered TO..|..her EYE,................................(iambic trimeter)
.......1....       .... ..2.........  ....3.............4
The BIRDS..|..that WAN..|..ton IN..|..the AIR...............(iambic tetrameter)
......1......   ... ..;..2...... ....3
Know NO..|..such LIB..|..er TY....................................(iambic trimeter)
Internal Rhyme
.......Lovelace also uses internal rhyme in the poem, as the following lines indicate:

When I lie tangled in her hair (line 5)
And fetter'd to her eye (line 6)
Know no such liberty (line 8)
When flowing cups run swiftly round (line 9)
When thirsty grief in wine we steep (line 13)
When I shall voice aloud how good (line 24)

..
Theme
No One Can Imprison the Human Mind
.......A human being remains free to think and dream—as well as to hold fast to controversial opinions—even though his body has limited mobility. Obviously, this theme can apply not only to a prisoner in a cell but also to anyone limited by circumstances and conditions, such as blindness, paralysis, geographical isolation, economic deprivation, and so on. 

To Althea, From Prison
Text of the Poem
Summaries and Notes
When Love with unconfinèd wings
Although in prison, the poet is freer than the birds that fly about at
  Hovers within my gates,
will. Why? Because his mind is free. He can imagine his love, 
And my divine Althea brings
Althea, so close to him that he becomes tangled in her hair and 
  To whisper at the grates; 
their gazes meet when they are only inches apart.
When I lie tangled in her hair
è: The grave accent over the e indicates that the letter receives
  And fetter'd to her eye, 
full pronunciation: UN kon FY ned 
The birds that wanton in the air 
within my gates: inside the prison; grates: bars, grill
  Know no such liberty. 
wanton: fly freely and aimlessly




When flowing cups run swiftly round 
Fishes have a whole ocean from which to drink. But they are less 
  With no allaying Thames,
free to drink than I am here in prison. My imagination makes 
Our careless heads with roses bound, 
bottomless cups flow with wine—without water from the River 
  Our hearts with loyal flames;
Thames to dilute it—as I and my friends wear rosy wreaths and 
When thirsty grief in wine we steep,
toast the king. We may mourn the loss of our rights, but still there
  When healths and draughts go free—
are toasts (healths) and draughts (the taking in of wine).
Fishes that tipple in the deep
loyal flames: support for the king
  Know no such liberty.




When, like committed linnets, I
Though I am in prison, I am free to sing the praises of my king.
  With shriller throat shall sing
No wind, however strong, can make as great a sound as I can
The sweetness, mercy, majesty, 
when I sing the glories of my monarch. 
  And glories of my King;
committed linnets: caged birds that include canaries and 
When I shall voice aloud how good
sparrows
  He is, how great should be,
Enlargèd winds, that curl the flood,
  Know no such liberty.




Stone walls do not a prison make,
The walls and iron bars that surround me cannot imprison me,
  Nor iron bars a cage;
for my mind remains free. Because I am innocent of wrongdoing,
Minds innocent and quiet take
I regard prison as a hermitage, a retreat where I can concentrate
  That for an hermitage;
on what matters to me—my love for Althea and the principles by 
If I have freedom in my love
which I live. Only angels have as much freedom as I do.
  And in my soul am free,
Angels alone, that soar above,
  Enjoy such liberty.
.
Repetition

.......To emphasize and support his theme, Lovelace uses repetition. Notice, for example, that seven clauses begin with when. Notice also that the first three stanzas each end with Know no such liberty and that the final stanza ends with Enjoy such liberty. 
.......Repetition also helps to form the structure of the poem in that each stanza has a single sentence with several clauses.
Figures of Speech
Alliteration

When Love with unconfinèd wings (line 1)
When I lie tangled in her hair (line 5)
Know no such liberty (line 8)
When thirsty grief in wine we steep (line 13)
Anaphora

Our careless heads with roses bound 
Our hearts with loyal flames (lines 11-12)

When thirsty grief in wine we steep,
When healths and draughts go free—(lines 13-14)
When I shall voice aloud how good / He is, how great should be (line 21-22)
Metaphor

When Love with unconfinèd wings
Hovers within my gates (lines 1-2)

Paradox
The entire poem rests on this paradox: the imprisoned speaker is a free man.

Our hearts with loyal flames (line 13)


Freedom and Captivity
The poem is structured round the paradoxes thrown up by freedom and captivity. For most prison writers, true freedom is internal, not external. This is true for religious writers, too. Donne wrote, ‘I/Except you' enthrall mee, never shall be free’ (‘Batter my heart’). Lovelace proposes three such examples of this paradox before deriving his conclusion in the final stanza.
Freedom through love
The first paradox is that of human love. He can lie ‘tangl'd in her hair/ And fetterd to her eye’, yet know emotional freedom unknown to the birds (some versions of the poem have ‘gods’), even though the birds are usually a symbol of freedom as they soar in the air. The imagery of the first stanza already suggests a prison visit, with the ‘Gates/ Grates’ rhyme. If he does not mean a prison literally, then he presumably is talking about the human body as a figurative prison, a somewhat platonic symbolism.
Other freedoms
The second stanza suggests the freedom of alcohol. The alcohol stirs up his patriotism. Maybe they make loyal pledges and toasts (‘Healths’). Again, this freedom is compared to the fish, who move in a liquid medium but do not know this inner freedom of spirit. The third expression of this paradox is to do with freedom of speech. Even when ‘like committed Linnets’ (a caged songbird), he can still ‘voyce aloud’ his political allegiance. In this he is freer than the wind, that can make as much noise as it likes anywhere, since again it is an inner freedom.


What is the tone of the poem "To Althea, From Prison" by Richard Lovelace?
Overall, the poem is a declaration of independence that some might interpret as being almost defiant. The speaker is imprisoned, away from the woman he loves because of his loyalty to the King whose enemies have captured him. However, he does not find this a situation to be mourned or regretted.
Instead, he affirms the freedom of his mind and spirit. Because his thoughts can not be taken from him, he is able to remember and imagine the time and pleasures he shared with his lover. Despite the consequences of his loyalty to the King, he remains steadfast in loudly proclaiming "how good He is."
The speaker exults in the freedom of his spirit. Prison is not a punishment; the victory of mind over physical location is celebrated in this poem.

How might one explain the opening stanza of the poem "To Althea, from Prison," by Richard Lovelace?
The opening stanza of Richard Lovelace’s poem “To Althea, from Prison” can be explicated as follows:

WHEN love with unconfined wings
When Cupid, the classical god of love (who is usually depicted as a young boy who has wings and is therefore capable of flying freely)

Hovers within my Gates;
hovers within the gates of the prison in which I am presently confined

And my divine Althea brings
and when Cupid brings the virtuous and beautiful woman whom I love, whose name is Althea (and whose name, in Greek, means “healer”)

To whisper at the Grates;
so that she can whisper to me through the iron grates of my prison cell

When I lye tangled in her hair
and when I lie tangled in her hair (either literally or perhaps only metaphorically, since it is hard to imagine at first how he, while imprisoned, can lie tangled in her hair literally [although see comments below])
 And fettered to her eye;
and when I am imprisoned by looking at her beautiful eye(s),

The birds that wanton in the Air,
Then (I have to declare) that (even) the birds that are free to fly through the air
Know no such liberty.
Do not possess the kind of freedom that I possess.
The line in this poem that causes the most interpretive difficult is the line declaring that the speaker lies “tangled” in the hair of Althea.  The verb “lye” implies that he is not merely touching her hair but that somehow he is touching it as they lie together. Prisoners in the seventeenth century, especially those who were prominent or wealthy, could often have visitors to their cells, and so perhaps this fact explains how Althea might actually have lain with the speaker in his cell. Or perhaps the speaker uses the word “tangled” in a merely metaphorical sense: as he gazes upon her hair, he feels tangled in it.  The verb “lye,” however, seems very literal.

How might one paraphrase and explain the meaning of the second stanza of Richard Lovelace's poem "To Althea, from Prison"?
The second stanza of Richard Lovelace’s poem “To Althea, from Prison” reads as follows:
When flowing Cups run swiftly round
   With no allaying Thames,        [10]
Our careless heads with Roses bound,
   Our hearts with Loyal Flames;
When thirsty grief in Wine we steep,
   When Healths and draughts go free,
Fishes that tipple in the Deep  [15]
   Know no such Liberty.
These lines might be paraphrased and analyzed as follows: when cups of wine, freely filled and refilled, are passed around and consumed and when that wine is not diluted either in flavor or in alcoholic content by having water from the River Thames (the main river in London) mixed with it; and when we wear crowns of roses on our heads (heads which are free from cares); and when we feel in our hearts the fire of loyalty (probably loyalty to King Charles I, who was in conflict with Parliament at the time this poem was written, although “loyal” here may also imply loyalty to one’s friends); and when we drown our sorrows by drinking wine; and when we are free to drink abundantly to the health of others and propose toasts to their health as we do so drink; when all these events occur, then the very fish that drink from the sea are not as free as we feel, even if we are imprisoned.  This stanza seems to imply either (1) drinking with fellow prisoners; or (2) drinking with friends who visit the speaker in prison; or (3) both. Such visits were not uncommon.
The first stanza of the poem had emphasized the consolations that feminine beauty could provide to the imprisoned speaker. This stanza implies that consolations that can be provided by (probably) male friends and fellowship and by shared drinking. In both this stanza and the first stanza, the speaker implies that although he may be imprisoned physically, in his mind and soul and spirit he is essentially free. In other words, he responds to his predicament with a kind of Christian stoicism.  The Christian flavor of his response will become clearer and clearer as the poem proceeds.

How might one paraphrase and explain the third stanza of the poem "To Althea, from Prison," by Richard Lovelace?
The third stanza of Richard Lovelace’s poem titled “To Althea, from Prison,” reads as follows:
When (like committed linnets) I
   With shriller throat shall sing
The sweetness, Mercy, Majesty,
   And glories of my King;   [20]
When I shall voice aloud how good
   He is, how Great should be,
Enlargèd Winds, that curl the Flood,
   Know no such Liberty.
This stanza might be paraphrased and analyzed in the following ways: when I (like encaged songbirds) sing even more loudly and forcefully than a bird could sing and when I use my singing to celebrate the goodness, compassion, and grandness of my king (King Charles I); and when I proclaim how virtuous he is and how great in power he should be (that is, if he were properly appreciated by his subjects, some of whom are rebelling against him); then, when all these events occur, not even the freely flowing winds that stir up waves on the sea will know no greater liberty than I know.
Paradoxically, the speaker in this stanza engages in the very kind of singing he imagines himself doing in the future. This stanza, then, calls a kind of subtle attention to the fact that he is already fulfilling the promises this stanza makes.
Notice the progression of the poem so far: from an emphasis on love of women (in stanza one), to an emphasis on fellowship with (probably male) friends (in stanza two); to an emphasis on love and loyalty to the king (in the present stanza).  The poem is organized in such a way that it becomes progressively more serious and broader in its implications with each new stanza. In a sense, the poem also moves up the so-called “Great Chain of Being” (which explained the hierarchy of the universe).  It is not surprising, then, that heavenly angels are mentioned in the fourth and final stanza.
Please explain the fourth stanza from "To Althea, from Prison" by Richard Lovelace.
A courtier of King Charles I, Lovelace, this Cavalier poet, wrote this famous and oft quoted stanza describing what can not bind freedom and offering an analogy showing what can experience freedom the way he experiences it, the way he knows it. In order to understand the fourth stanza, we have to see it in relationship to the others.

The first three stanzas describe three instances when Lovelace knows unbounded freedom. This is a freedom, a "liberty," that is not rivaled by the freedom of birds of the air,  not known by fish in the deep sea, not felt by storm winds that toss the sea waves.
The birds that wanton in the Air,
   Know no such Liberty.
[...]
Fishes that tipple in the Deep
   Know no such Liberty.
[...]
Enlargèd Winds, that curl the Flood,
   Know no such Liberty.
The fourth stanza turns and gives the paradoxical counterpoint to the three stanzas going before. In the fourth, instead of saying where he knows and experiences freedom and liberty, as before, Lovelace says, instead, what he will not recognize as a prison; what he will not recognize as a captivity that subdues and robs his liberty.

Lovelace famously says that walls do not rob freedom, do not rob liberty; that iron bars do not bind liberty; and that innocent minds are not harmed by walls and bars. He then summarizes the meaning of the first three stanzas and states that (1) innocence sees imprisoning chains and bars as a religious "Hermitage," a place where divine love is contemplated; (2) that he has freedom in the love he speaks of; (3) that in his hermitage of iron and stone, his soul is free.
The ending analogy states that only Angels "that soar" in the heavens, far above mortal walls and iron bars, know the freedom and liberty he knows. The fourth stanza thus speaks of true liberty and gives comfort to Lovelace's beloved from whom he is separated.
Stone Walls do not a Prison make,
   Nor Iron bars a Cage;
Minds innocent and quiet take
   That for an Hermitage.
If I have freedom in my Love,
   And in my soul am free,
Angels alone that soar above,
   Enjoy such Liberty. 


Friday, April 26, 2013

: poem of George Herbert "The Collar" Analysis










I struck the board, and cried "No more!
I will abroad.
What, shall I ever sigh and pine?
My lines and life are free; free as the road,
Loose as the wind, as large as store.
Shall I be still in suit?
Have I no harvest but a thorn
To let me blood, and not restore
What I have lost with cordial fruit?
Sure there was wine
Before my sighs did dry it; there was corn
Before my tears did drown it.
Is the year only lost to me?
Have I no bays to crown it?
No flowers, no garlands gay? all blasted?
All wasted?
Not so, my heart: but there is fruit,
And thou hast hands.
Recover all thy sigh-blown age
On double pleasures: leave thy cold dispute
Of what is fit, and not. Forsake thy cage,
Thy rope of sands,
Which petty thoughts have made, and made to thee
Good cable, to enforce and draw,
And be thy law,
While thou didst wink and wouldst not see.
Away; take heed:
I will abroad.
Call in thy death's head there: tie up thy fears.
He that forbears
To suit and serve his need,
Deserves his load."
But as I raved and grew more fierce and wild
At every word,
Methoughts I heard one calling "Child!"
And I replied "My Lord".

s generic levitra legal generic levitra india buy cheap Levitra Pharmacy viagra cialis and levitra generic real generic levitra

| Posted on 2012-03-15 | by a guest



.: :.

buy diazepam online order diazepam without a over the counter make buy diazepam buy Prednisone Online buy prednisone without a prescription drugs 3 mg prednisone 20mg zolpidem online mail order zolpidem cheap zolpidem & breastfeeding buy valium buy generic Valium risks valium online a127m


| Posted on 2012-03-04 | by a guest



.: :.

buy clomid and nolvadex clomid online 100mg success cheap clomid mg propecia pharmacy cheap propecia uk online pharmacy before buy propecia online doxycycline hyclate ta 100mg doxycycline cost doxycycline hyclate and acne cheap tadalafil generic cialis next day delivery x buy tadalafil online drugs


| Posted on 2012-02-24 | by a guest



.: :.

buy carisoprodol online buy Soma No Prescription cheap soma buy phentermine online Phentermine no Prescription does it look like phentermine online prednisone blogs generic prednisone x erowid prednisone drug Buy Ambien No Prescription lowes generic ambien x sale zolpidem online


| Posted on 2012-02-19 | by a guest



.: :.

Levitra generic levitra mumbai generic levitra bangalore buy generic Cialis generic cialis overnight shipping generic cialis daily x doxycycline oral suspension buy doxycycline what is doxycycline used for zolpidem tartrate generic zolpidem tartrate cheap generic zolpidem


| Posted on 2012-02-17 | by a guest



.: :.

buy soma carisoprodol soma generic soma generic Cialis canada cialis generic viagra low dose cialis generic xanax generic cheap xanax and sexual performance xanax online x phentermine online phentermine online buy phentermine cable


| Posted on 2012-02-16 | by a guest



.: :.

how to play payday payday lenders payday loans indianapolis indiana generic Cialis online buy generic cialis canada walgreens cialis generic buy Cialis viagra online buy tadalafil x cheap cialis generic mastercard x generic ambien at walgreens zolpidem price generic ambien 10mg


| Posted on 2012-02-09 | by a guest



.: :.

cheap Cialis aetna cialis generic x internet pharmacy cialis generic medications x buy phentermine


| Posted on 2012-02-08 | by a guest




.: :.

Quickly the clothes model moved from producing revenue of forty five million Euros a year to four hundred million Euros, a meteoric rise by any requirements. This only goes to show how very hot and sought just after the Moncler brand has grow to be due to the fact it initial made its debut around the globe phase as the official provider for that French winter season Olympic team. From Grenoble, exactly where everything began, Moncler has produced its strategy to Aspen, The big apple.


These are effectively created jackets. The top quality is in the stitching which is powerful adequate to resist any tough wearing. moncler women

can be a name recognized to be beyond seasonal. It works well in maintaining the iciness out and maintaining the wearer heat. The jacket is available in many different bright, bold stylish colors. They\'re made of the fluffy internal coating to help keep the body warm and have deep pockets to keep your hands heat and comfy.

The styles which they are available in have all been created to help keep in step with current style tendencies. Moncler jackets are readily available in girls and men\'s types and various sizes too. Anyone can personal a winter jacket that not just keeps them heat but appears fashionable.


Instead of holding the traditional design, Monclerslife hired some outstanding graduates from Istituto Marangoni in 1988, which produced it the most popular model that winter. In the part of color, fresh color, such as red, yellow, blue and green had been pieced together by the young designers, and the skinniness and coat cloth were mixed cut, which shaped the unusual aesthetical standard from the down jacket. From then on, Monclerslife became the necessaries on the European\'s, no matter you had been a pop star or a frequent people, everyone would have such kind of down jacket, which made by Monclerslife. The big shots of fashion highly praised in succession that Monclerslife had made the popularity of outdoor sports activities and leisure down jacket ten years ahead. Fashion magazines such as ELLE had been scramble to report that Monclerslife was a model needless to pay for any stars as the face, simply because it had been chosen consciously by folks. And clothing dealers all more than the globe promptly followed to get Moncleslife , which made it a dominant power the whole winter in the earth for its unique charm.


| Posted on 2011-11-25 | by a guest

The Poem

“The Collar” is George Herbert’s most extensive and detailed poem of rebellion. Thirty-two of its thirty-six lines describe what the poem itself calls the ravings of a person growing “more fierce and wild” as he strains to release himself from the restrictive pressures that surround him. Much like John Donne’s energetic complaints to God in several of his Holy Sonnets, “The Collar” gives full expression to the speaker’s resentment of the pain and rigor of leading a life that is moral and holy. Only after these complaints are freely, almost hysterically voiced is the speaker taught how quickly they can be banished by a patient God who ultimately gives more than he asks.
The poem begins with a dramatic statement of refusal—“I struck the board, and cried, No more”—and the following lines give examples of the kind of life that the speaker wants to leave behind. He is a person of ambition and desire, yet everything in life seems to conspire to frustrate or torment him. His life is one of “sighs” and “tears,” a situation he finds particularly distressing because he can readily imagine the joys and glories, the wine, fruit, and flowers, that are withheld from him.
The process of describing his past failure to seize the available pleasures of life makes him more determined to change his ways immediately and exchange his tears for the pursuit of “double pleasures.” Like a libertine, he suggests that inhibitions and moral laws are only a “rope of sands” once a person decides not to be bound by them. Instead of being blind to the forbidden pleasures of life, he will now serve only his needs and desires. Enraptured by his own enthusiasm, even the death’s-head, the traditional reminder of mortality and the nearness of judgment, is no longer intimidating and will certainly not be part of his luggage as he prepares to go abroad. He is confident that all of his fears can be neatly bundled up and left behind, and he attempts to wind up his argument with what sounds like a proverb celebrating his new creed of practical selfishness: “He that forbears/ To suit and serve his need,/ Deserves his load.”
This is not, however, the true finale of his argument, which is provided by the intervention of a holy voice, a device used in several other key poems by Herbert. All the ravings of the speaker are answered by one gentle word, “Child,” an almost miraculous reminder that not only is the speaker always overheard by God, but, more important, he is always protected, instructed, and accepted. This is the way the world of rebellion ends, not with a bang but with a whisper, and when the speaker replies “My Lord,” he acknowledges not only that his rebelliousness is at an end but that devotion to such a Lord is not painful servitude but joyful freedom. In a curious way, the story of this poem is thus foretold by the multiple meanings hinted at by the title: “The Collar” suggests a restrictive collar that the speaker wants to slip and the angry “choler” to which he gives voice throughout most of the lines; yet even in the depths of his anger and rebelliousness, the speaker is a “caller,” and God is always ready to answer.
Forms and Devices
One of the most interesting aspects of “The Collar” is the way the form of the poem helps to convey not only the dramatic rebelliousness of the speaker but also the concluding resolution. The speaker’s anger and nervousness are underscored in several ways. His speech pattern is halting and constantly interrupted. Many of the statements are short, and the frequent punctuation in the lines gives them a clipped, staccato sound, adding to the impression of uneasiness. Any sense that this is the speech of a confident and determined man is also undermined by the fact that much of it takes the form of questions. These are meant to be rhetorical questions, but still they suggest that the speaker is plagued with doubts.
At first glance, the overall structure of “The Collar” seems to mirror the state of mind of the speaker. The line lengths alternate in an apparently irregular pattern, and the rhyme scheme is difficult to assess. As a result, the structure of the poem may be taken as an embodiment of the rebelliousness of the man who is in the process of swearing off all laws and restrictions. “My lines and life are free,” he says, and the irregular lines of the poem signify his first step toward a life of pleasurable transgression. From another perspective, the form of the poem seems not so much free as chaotic, thus subtly indicating that a person who repudiates the legal and moral restrictions of life abandons the basic principles of order and thereby begins a descent into incoherence, the necessary by-product of rebelliousness.
The structure of “The Collar,” however, is neither completely free nor chaotic, but extremely subtle, discernible only after careful and patient analysis. Beneath the superficial disorder, or developing progressively through it, is an orderly pattern that climaxes in the last four lines of the poem. This is best seen in the rhyme scheme. As Joseph H. Summers points out in George Herbert: His Religion and Art (1954), every line in “The Collar” finds a rhyme somewhere, but through most of the poem there are many off-rhymes, and because rhymes do not occur at predictable, regular intervals, they sometimes undermine rather than create a sense of closure. Near the end, the rhyming lines begin to occur closer and closer, but the speaker’s last assertion that he is tying up his fears is still belied by the irregular off-rhymes (abroad/load, fears/forbears). Only in the last four lines do the rhymes become regular (alternating abab) and purposeful: The designation of the speaker as “wild” is replaced by the new name given to him, “Child,” and his every “word” of rebelliousness gives way to “Lord,” the divine word capable of redeeming human anger, weakness, and folly.
Themes and Meanings
The recurrent topic of Herbert’s poems is not perfection but correction. Perfection is unreachable, but constant correction is one of the rules of religious life (and religious poetry) for Herbert. The speaker of “The Collar” is by no means wicked or reprehensible. He is, in fact, all too human, and his protest against the inevitable disappointments, restrictions, and pains of life is one with which most of the readers of this poem can sympathize and identify. Much to his credit, Herbert never denies the validity of the experiences described in “The Collar” or suggests that such feelings, however confused or disordered or angry, are unworthy of expression. Herbert knew that the Bible, especially the book of Psalms, one of his great spiritual and poetic models, dwells repeatedly on laments and complaints as radical as those in “The Collar.”
Alongside the Bible, perhaps there is also something of a different kind of social and religious ritualism here—the carnivalesque spirit. Carnival is a festival time of at least temporary release from the obligations and restraints of daily life, and one is not only freed but even encouraged to abuse, parody, or otherwise flout the figures of authority and “cold dispute[s]/ Of what is fit, and not” and grab for the physical pleasures at hand. Carnival functions not only as an individual and societal relief valve, letting off pressure that might otherwise build to intolerable levels, but also an important acknowledgment of the claims of the body and a person’s legitimate right to cry out against the strains of religion, law, and morality.
In works by William Shakespeare, according to C. L. Barber in Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy (1959), carnivalesque release leads to clarification, and this is precisely the pattern of “The Collar,” where Herbert allows the speaker full expression of his freedom as part of a rhythm of spiritual life that returns hi

| Posted on 2011-06-10 | by a guest

The meaning of the poem can be implied from the name of the poem- The collar. What does a collar represent? A collar represents subjectability(submission may be the word that fits here), and because of subjectability it also represents mutability. This definition is evidenced in the theme of the poem. Herbert was obviously contemplating abandoning his role as a priest, but Herbert finally meets reality at the end of the poem and retains the Christian theistic worldview by returning to God and crying \"My Lord\". God gives us the power of will, we can choose to do what we want to do. But will it be beneficial if we do so when we come to the end of the road? Herbert believed that it wasn\'t and suggested that the fracas between not only God and man to cease but also the fracas between him and God. By doing so Herbert keeps the faith and is separated \" set apart\" from the world. ( i.e. Romans 12:2)


| Posted on 2011-02-04 | by a guest

the collar\' is the most superb art of work of George Herbert and is truly regarded as a saint among metaphysical poets.


| Posted on 2010-09-30 | by a guest


the collar is a religious poem that is represented by contraption and restraint when the speaker talks about rope, cable, cages, and the collar.


| Posted on 2010-09-26 | by a guest


''The Collar'' is a symbolic, religious poem. In this poem, Herbert describes the agony and conflict experienced by him as a priest. The collar - the high collar of the priest- is symbolic of the restraints imposed upon a priest. The poet evidently seems to be in a conflict experiencing the two way pull between the secular life and the religious life of a priest.

written by:
Ziaulhaq Ateed

| Posted on 2010-05-03 | by a guest





This is a about Herbert's calling as a pastor and wrestling with the sacrifice and self-pity that come from such a poured out life. The collar is both a sign of his office and a symbol his entrapment. However there is a tenderness in the last line when he realizes to Whom he belongs.


| Posted on 2009-10-21 | by a guest


The Collar is basically about divine intoxication and the war between being intoxicated and the veil which separates the contemplative and the love of god. The poet does believe in a Supreme power which sustains all living thing in this universe and the other universes(metaphorical).

I an personally relate to it due to my own limited understanding of God.

| Posted on 2009-10-12 | by a guest




The Collar analysis :
Perhaps the best treatment of the subject of submission to the Divine Will is to be found in The Collar, which is certainly among the most celebrated of Herbert's lyrics. Once again, the form closely mirrors the argument. The poem opens with an account of an exasperated outburst of rebellion by the poet:
“I struck the board, and cry'd, No more.
I will abroad.”
What follows is a venting of spleen - an assertion of freedom, a complaint of grievances against the life of devotion out of which the poet intends to break, leading to a boastful challenge to the alleged morbid seriousness and paralysing timidity of the life the poet is renouncing. As the poet raves, growing “more fierce and wild/At every word”, he hears God calling him and, instantly, knows his place and admits God's authority.
The poem is in the iambic metre, but the lines are of varied length and there are no divisions into stanzas. The apparent randomness of form serves a dual purpose: it exaggerates the conversational tone - we can imagine the poet really speaking these lines. From “No more” in the first line to: “He that forbears/To suit and serve his need,/Deserves his load” the poem reads like a very histrionic soliloquy. The second effect of this randomness is to suggest the indiscipline of the rebellious spirit, which is both cause and consequence of the rebellion. The argument is heated and passionate but unconvincing. As it proceeds, the reader has the sense that the reasoning has not been premeditated and pondered, but is impulsive, spoken in heat. It seems like boastful posturing even before the poem's conclusion. With the poem's conclusion it is made to look ridiculous. In justifying his rebellion against the Divine yoke Herbert talks of religious prescriptions as a “cage” or “rope of sands” which is only made to seem “good cable” by the poet's own “pettie thoughts”. Yet, as he admits God as Lord, Herbert makes it clear that it is the attempt to rebel which is like “sand” and that the true “pettie thoughts” are those he has just asserted so bombastically.
The technical feature that most typifies this pretentious self-assertion is the redundant or “rhetorical” question, the answer to which is supposed to be self-evident and to support the greater argument in which it appears. Knowing where his poem will end, Herbert may be said to use this device ironically with a sense of its ridiculousness, especially when used with such predictable frequency (eight times in not many more than eight short lines). At the time he says these things, of course, the speaker is not being ironic but giving an aggrieved proof or demonstration of his self-inflicted loss:
“What? shall I ever sigh and pine?
...Shall I be still in suit?
...Is the year onely lost to me?”
The questions, and the many short lines, give the poem a fitful and uneven quality; there is no fluency of movement until the final quatrain of the poem. In these lines the poet reflects, calmly, on the result of the outburst he has just repeated. The ranting and raving is instantly, easily, dispelled by the gentlest of reminders, from God, of the poet's subservience.
God speaks in a “still small voice” (as in 1 Kings 19.12, Revised Version) and the submission is instant. The silly boasting spoken to bolster the courage of the self could not convincingly repeated in the presence of God. God has no need to answer the arguments: His mere presence exposes their hollowness. So, in these lines, the poem is fluent, eloquent, calm and subdued everything the preceding lines are not. Each pair of lines can be read almost as a single line; in the penultimate pair the syntax requires it (as modern editors' punctuation shows). The pairs seem to be of equal length to the ear though counting syllables will show an extra iambic foot in the final line.
“But as I rav'd and grew more fierce and wild
At every word
Me thoughts I heard one calling, Child!
And I reply'd, My Lord.”
That extra foot is, in effect, the conclusion to the poet's rebellion as to the poem: “My lord” truly shows the poet's acceptance of “The Collar”.
Written by : Alaa Cali4nia Boy

| Posted on 2009-07-28 | by a guest

This poem appears to reflect Herbert's consideration of how one should lead their life in order to become closer to God. Herbert reflects upon the bargain struck to move forward and thus (possibly)away from sin. The first part of the stanza notes the need to recognise the need to agree/bargain or haggle the price one should pay to stop grieving at mis-fortunes found in life and states the intention to move away/ onward from his previous way of life.
Herbert questions the point of bemoaning ones lot – and acknowledges that one’s way in life includes a freedom of choice - therefore life is what one makes it.
He ponders whether he can measure up to the challenge of this new way forward.
Throughout the poem he appears to ponder what life offers and what he has to show for his existence
Have I nothing else to give /produce?(other than to bleed at life’s hardship and not repent - let loose bad blood (evil)
Should one only take part in a semi-harvest then one will only see what is lost not gained – The juices of life are not only sweet but produced from the pulp of fruit (possibly could refer to the fruits of one’s labour?)Aluding to the thought that there are many facets of life which contribute to the making of it – Wine is made from the whole fruit (yet represents the body of Christ) what is left is discarded -such as pulp, seeds skin but it would not have been possible to make the wine without therefore the whole/entire person(mind and body) is required to make the best of what one is given. It could be that Herbert is drawing a comparison to the idea that in death the husk of the person (the body) will be discarded and that the produce/juices of the body is simply the soul.
Wasting the produce / harvest represents not making the most of what one has been given.
Has one nothing to show for labour/toil –existence?
Can there be nothing to show for the year? Can’t one crown / top what has been provided – celebrate the beauty and goodness – look for the good rather than the bad? (This could also be considering that others in the world also suffer)
Recognising that there is reward if one looks at what can be harvested – should God’s endowment not be celebrated?
Take back all the sighs/ moaning and regrets- recoup your losses to judge what is worthy of one’s self and refrain from that which restricts the boundaries of goodness – give up pointless / useless bonds which encourage negative thoughts. Rather one should seek strong bonds – look for the good for inspiration – Making this the way that one governs his/her way in life. While ones eyes are closed to this train of thought the way will not be lit / shown. Herbert suggests that he has moved away from the discourse of regret and immediate gratification of worldly goods.
Reign in your fears and receive your just deserts the way you clothe/conduct your life will reap its reward.
(Suggests that reflected in the bible- give up your worldly goods to find reward in heaven.)
A reflection that the reader / listener should take notice of these thoughts/warning; suggesting that the whilst raging against injustices of life Herbert came to hear the voice of God and responded by turning to religion.
Written by : Alaa Cali4nia Boy

| Posted on 2009-07-28 | by a guest



.: general points-the collar :.

theme=religious doubt

general tone= agressive
we see alot of doubt and questioning (rhetorical questions near beginning
'trapped' imagery (ropes of sand etc)

| Posted on 2008-02-03 | by a guest



.: The Collar analysis :.

portrays agitation, indignation, frustration 'All blasted?' 'All wasted' flurry of rhetorical questions. Cross reference Herbert's poem 'Forerunners' similarlt uses rhetorical questions to portray indignation 'Must they dispark those sparkling notions?'

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
www.hypersmash.com