www.hypersmash.com

تابعنا على شبكاتنا الإجتماعية

This is default featured post 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Showing posts with label Walk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Walk. Show all posts

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Literary Analysis of Robert Burns's A Red, Red Rose


Literary Analysis of Robert Burns's A Red, Red Rose





Period of English Literature
18th Century England; The Age of Enlightenment; 1796
Historical Background
      Robert Burns is often considered a writer ahead of his time, who often embraced the idea of using common language to reach the common person just slightly before this idea became popularized as the Age of Romanticism swept across the globe.
      When Burns published “A Red, Red Rose” in 1794, the Age of Enlightenment was dwindling to an end.
      Like the Romantics, he stressed emotion, not reason; were concerned with experiencing nature, not understanding it; and allowed for the possibility of an explicable, supernatural world
      His poetry demonstrates the Romantics’ faith in simple, common, accessible language is one of the ideas that was around before the movement in general took root.
      This treatment of time and beauty predicts the work of the later Romantic poets, who took Burns’s work as an important influence.
Type of Work (Form)
Ballad stanza
Ballad: The ballad is an old form of verse adapted for singing or recitation, originating in the days when most poetry existed in spoken rather than written form. The typical subject matter of most ballads reflects folk themes important to common people: love, courage, the mysterious, and the supernatural. Though the ballad is generally rich in musical qualities such as rhythm and repetition, it often portrays both ideas and feelings in overwrought but simplistic terms.

Structure
Composition
·         Four four-line stanzas (or quatrains)
·         The first and third lines of each stanza have four stressed syllables, while the second and fourth lines have three stressed syllables.
Voice
First Person (My, I)
Subject
The speaker’s confession of love and passion to his lover.
Tone
Romantic and melancholy (a deep feeling of sadness)
Themes
·         The transient nature of beauty and love.
·         The delicate and fragile nature of beauty and love.
·         A meditation on the speaker’s consciousness of time and on limits that time can place upon human emotions.
Summary of Poem
The speaker compares his love first with a blooming rose in spring and then with a melody “sweetly play’d in tune.” If these similes seem the typical fodder for love-song lyricists, the second and third stanzas introduce the subtler and more complex implications of time. In trying to quantify his feelings—and in searching for the perfect metaphor to describe the “eternal” nature of his love—the speaker inevitably comes up against love’s greatest limitation, “the sands o’ life.” This image of the hour-glass forces the reader to reassess of the poem’s first and loveliest image: A “red, red rose” is itself an object of an hour, “newly sprung” only “in June” and afterward subject to the decay of time. This treatment of time and beauty predicts the work of the later Romantic poets, who took Burns’s work as an important influence.
Summary of  Lines 1-2
The reader may be already familiar with the poem’s much-quoted first line. Its appeal over time probably stems from the boldness of its assertion— the speaker’s love conveyed through the conventional image of the rose and through the line’s four strong beats. The poet’s choice of a rose may at first seem trite, and the color “red” may seem too obvious a symbol of love and passion. Yet if the comparison between the beloved and the rose verges on cliché, a careful reading reveals the subtler ways in which the speaker expresses his conviction. Why, for instance, is the word “red” repeated? The answer might be found in the second line. While red is the expected hue of the flower, the repetition of the adjective represents the fullest and most lovely manifestation of the rose: its ideal state. Such also is the nature of the speaker’s love. “Newly sprung,” it exists in its purest and most perfect state—none of its vitality has faded; time has not scarred it with age or decay. Yet this embodiment of love is a temporary one. Like the rose, which can exist in this lush form only “in June,” the speaker’s feelings and his beloved’s beauty cannot remain frozen in time: they, like all other forms of beauty, are passing.
Summary of  Lines 3-4
Perhaps it is the speaker’s recognition of the rose’s brief beauty that compels him to pursue another metaphor for his love. This time he chooses to compare her to a lovely melody from a song, but this is also a temporary form of beauty. While a song may be “sweetly play’d in tune,” it too is a product of time, of beats and measures. When the song has ended, its beauty lives on only in abstraction –as the idea of the beautiful song.
Summary of  Lines 5-8
The second stanza plays on the word “luve,” revealing the elusive nature of the concept. When the speaker says “I will luve thee still,” he plays on the concept of time. The line seems to indicate that the speaker will love continuously or forever, but the following line does put a limit on the amount of time he will love. His passion will continue “Till” a certain time – when “the seas   gang dry.” Though the prospect of the seas drying up seems remote, it exists nonetheless. Thus, while the sentiment seems wholly romantic, there remains in it a hint of melancholy: the speaker is saying his love will last a long time – but that it is not eternal in the purest sense.
Summary of  Lines 9-11
The repetition here of “Till a’ the seas gang dry” is in keeping with the song’s musicality. But in it there is also a hint of reconsideration, as if the speaker has just understood the implications of what he has said. From this, he moves to another attempt to express eternity, yet this too depends on the word “Till”: he will love until the rocks “melt wi’ the sun.” But the rocks may indeed melt one day, or erode, in any case, under the effects of the sun, wind, and weather. At that point that love will cease, so again, his sentiments are not wholly timeless.
Summary of  Line 12
Line 12 also casts some doubt on the speaker’s intentions, since it can be interpreted in two ways. In one sense, he could mean that their love is separate - above or beyond - the sands of time. This indicates that it will last forever and won’t change or end because of time. On the other hand, he almost seems to emphasize the fact that the sands are running, which is to say time is running out, as sand runs out of the hourglass. This direct reference to time also reminds us of the first two lines in the poem: the momentary, time-bound state of a “red, red rose that’s newly sprung in June.” Read in this way, the poem becomes more than the simple love ballad that it seemed initially; instead, it can also be seen as a meditation on the speaker’s consciousness of time and on limits that time can place upon human emotions.
Summary of  Lines 13-16
The last stanza seems to shift away from the predominant concerns of the first three: the speaker turns from the concept of time to that of parting. He is journeying away from his love, assuring her that he will be true and will return. Yet the concept of time enters here as well: the speaker will transcend not only a vast distance (“ten thousand miles”) to be with his love, but also time itself, with words like “awhile” and “again” drawing the poem back to the main concerns of the first three stanzas.
Imagery
  • A Red, Red Rose: Used to express passionate love.
  • A melodie: Used to express the sweetness of his love.
  • Seas and Rocks:  The speaker is saying his love will last a long time – but that is not eternal in the purest sense.
  • Sands o’life:” The image of the hour-glass shows love’s greatest limitation: Time.
Language
Metaphor
·         “seas gang dry” and “ rocks melt wi' the sun” are both metaphors to describe the eternal nature of his love.
·         “the sands o’ life” demonstrates that time is running out, as sand runs out of the hourglass.
Simile
·         The speaker compares his love first with a blooming rose in spring and then with a melody “sweetly play’d in tune.”







الفصل السادس عشر في الغابة


الفصل السادس عشر






مازالت هستر مصره على قرارها انها تخلى ديمزديل يعرف هوية الشخص الى دخل حياته مهما كانت العواقب حاولت انها تقابله على البحر او تروح له غرفته لكنها خافت الناس تشك وخافت من شلنج وورث فقررت تقابله فى الغابة. في يوم هستر كانت تزور واحدة مريضه وعرفت ان ديمزيدل بكره راح يكون موجود.في اليوم الثاني خرجت هستر مع بيرل ومشيو للغابة كانو كل مايوصلو لنقطة فيها شمس كانت تختفى وبيرل قالت لامها نور الشمس مايحبك ويهرب منك لانه خايف من الشي دا الى انتى لابسته شوفيه يلعب هناك انا بروح امسكه مارح يخاف منى لانى صغيرة ولسه ماعندي الحرف دا على صدري .هستر قالت ولا عمره راح يكون عندك. بريل استغربت وسئلت امها يعنى لما اصير كبيرة مارح يكون عندي حرف زي حرفك راحت هستر قالت لها شوفى نور الشمس اجرى امسكيه قبل لايهرب .راحت بيرل لضوء الشمس و وقفت وسطه وبدئت هستر تقرب منها راحت بيرل قالت لها تبعد عشان النور مايخاف ويهرب هستر قالت لها لا انا اقدر امسكه حتى شوفي ومدت يدها عشان تمسك النور لكنه اختفى.





 كان اكثر شي مذهل في بيرل انه فيها روحانية وعمره ماكان فيها حزن وهستر كانت تفكر كيف البنت هذى ماتحزن واتمنت انها تحزن او تعاني عشان يكون عندنها عاطفة .هستر نادت على بيرل وقالت لها تعالى نجلس نستريح بيرل قالت لها انا مانى تعبانة لكن انتى اجلسي واحكيلي حكاية الرجل الاسود وكيف يطارد الناس و كيف يشيل معاه كتاب كبير وضخم وقلم حديدى يعطيه لكل شخص عشان يكتبو اسمائهم بدمهم وبعدين يحط علامته على صدرهم وقالت لامها يا امى انتى قابلتى الشخص دا! هستر قالت لها مين حكالك الحكاية دي؟ قالت لها الحرمة العجوزة الى كنا عندنها حسبتنى نايمة وحكت الحكاية دي وقالت انه قابل آلاف من الناس ورجعت سئلت امها هل انتى قابلتيه قبل كذا وهو الى حط الحرف ذا على صدرك وهل الحرف هذا ينور كل ماتقابليه فى هذى الغابة المظلمة؟ هل صحيح هذا الكلام؟ وانتى تشوفيه في الليل؟هستر قاتل لها قد قمتى من النوم فى الليل وماحصلتينى جمبك؟بيرل قالت لها لا بس انتى قابلتيه ولا لا! هستر قالت لها لو قلت لك كل حاجه تسبينى فى حالة بيرل قالت لها ايوة هستر راحت قالت ايوة انا قابلت الرجل الاسود مره وهذى علامته.




دخلو الغابة وجلسو بحيث الرايح و الجاي مايشوفهم وكان فى جدول ماء بيرل كانت تكلمه وهستر قالت ليش الجدول حزين؟ بيرل ردت عليها وقالت لو قلتى انتى سبب حزنك الجدول راح يقول سبب حزنه. هستر سكتتها وثالت لها فى احد جاى روحي العبي على ما اكلمه بيرل سئلتها اذا الى رايحه تكلمه هو الرجل الاسود هستر قالت لها روحي العبي بس لاتروحي بعيد بيرل قالت لها طيب لو كان الرجل الاسود مارح تخليني اشوفه واشوف الكتاب الى معاه؟قالت لها هستر هذا مش الرجل الاسود هذا ديمزديل قالت لها بيرل طيب هو يحط ايده على صدره لان الرجل الاسود حطله العلامة لماكتب فى الدفتر؟ طيب ليش ماحطها من برا زيك؟ هستر قالت لها روحي العبي بس لاتبعدى .



Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Emily Dickinson A Bird came down the Walk summary analysis



Emily Dickinson s A Bird came down the Walk
ban_dickinson.gif (620×100)

Summary

The speaker describes once seeing a bird come down the walk, unaware that it was being watched. The bird ate an angleworm, then “drank a Dew / From a convenient Grass—,” then hopped sideways to let a beetle pass by. The bird’s frightened, bead-like eyes glanced all around. Cautiously, the speaker offered him “a Crumb,” but the bird “unrolled his feathers” and flew away—as though rowing in the water, but with a grace gentler than that with which “Oars divide the ocean” or butterflies leap “off Banks of Noon”; the bird appeared to swim without splashing.

Form

Structurally, this poem is absolutely typical of Dickinson, using iambic trimeter with occasional four-syllable lines, following a loose ABCB rhyme scheme, and rhythmically breaking up the meter with long dashes. (In this poem, the dashes serve a relatively limited function, occurring only at the end of lines, and simply indicating slightly longer pauses at line breaks.)

images (252×200)

Commentary

Emily Dickinson’s life proves that it is not necessary to travel widely or lead a life full of Romantic grandeur and extreme drama in order to write great poetry; alone in her house at Amherst, Dickinson pondered her experience as fully, and felt it as acutely, as any poet who has ever lived. In this poem, the simple experience of watching a bird hop down a path allows her to exhibit her extraordinary poetic powers of observation and description.
Dickinson keenly depicts the bird as it eats a worm, pecks at the grass, hops by a beetle, and glances around fearfully. As a natural creature frightened by the speaker into flying away, the bird becomes an emblem for the quick, lively, ungraspable wild essence that distances nature from the human beings who desire to appropriate or tame it. But the most remarkable feature of this poem is the imagery of its final stanza, in which Dickinson provides one of the most breath-taking descriptions of flying in all of poetry. Simply by offering two quick comparisons of flight and by using aquatic motion (rowing and swimming), she evokes the delicacy and fluidity of moving through air. The image of butterflies leaping “off Banks of Noon,” splashlessly swimming though the sky, is one of the most memorable in all Dickinson’s writing.

In the Garden
A bird came down the walk:
He did not know I saw;
He bit an angle-worm in halves
And ate the fellow, raw.
And then he drank a dew
From a convenient grass,
And then hopped sidewise to the wall
To let a beetle pass.
He glanced with rapid eyes
That hurried all abroad,--
They looked like frightened beads, I thought;
He stirred his velvet head
Like one in danger; cautious,
I offered him a crumb,
And he unrolled his feathers
And rowed him softer home
Than oars divide the ocean,
Too silver for a seam,
Or butterflies, off banks of noon,
Leap, plashless, as they swim.
The speaker observes the bird and tries to establish contact with the bird by offering it food. The bird flies off. A few of the speaker's details describe the bird as a wild creature in nature, and more details present his behavior and his appearance in terms of human behavior.
Stanza one
Because the bird does not know the speaker is present, he behaves naturally, that is, his behavior is not affected by her presence. We see the bird's "wildness" or non-humanness in his biting the worm in half and eating it. "Raw" continues to emphasize his wildness. Ironically the word "raw" carries an implication of civilized values and practices ("raw" implicitly contrasts with cooked food). Why mention that the bird ate the worm raw? Would you expect the bird to cook the worm? In contrast, the fact that the bird "came" down the walk sounds civilized, socialized.  Does this description sound like someone walking on a sidewalk?
Stanza two
The birds' drinking dew (note the alliteration) suggests a certain refinement, and "from a grass" makes the action resemble the human action of drinking from a glass. And the bird politely allows a beetle to pass.
Stanza three
In lines one and two, the description of the bird's looking around is factual description and suggests the bird's caution and fear, as well as a possible threat in nature. With lines three and four, the speaker describes the bird in terms of civilization, with "beads" and "velvet."
Stanza four
The idea of danger in nature is made explicit but remains a minor note in this stanza and in the poem. It occupies only half a line, "Like one in danger." "Cautious," the speaker offers the crumb. How is "cautious " meant? Does the speaker feel the need to be cautious? or does she offer the crumb cautiously? (One of the characteristics of Dickinson's poetry is a tendency to drop endings as well as connecting words and phrases; you have to decide whether she has dropped the -ly ending from "cautious.")
Her action causes the bird to fly off. Her description of his flight details his beauty and the grace of his flight, a description which takes six lines. Does the idea of danger or of the bird's beauty receive more emphasis, or are the danger and the beauty emphasized equally? Does it matter in this poem whether one receives more emphasis than the other, that is, would the different emphases affect the meaning of the poem?
I am suggesting that this poem reveals both the danger and the beauty of nature. Does the poem support this reading? What might Dickinson's purpose be in having the narrator see the bird in "civilized" terms? Is it a way of pushing away or of controlling the threat and terrors that are always present and may suddenly appear in nature?

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
www.hypersmash.com